Case Study 04 · Freelance
Nik Neuro: one designer, one month, one system.
A massage therapist's website with too many fonts, too many colours, old photographs, and a scheduling page that was telling clients the wrong thing.
Client
Small business LLC
Team
1 designer
Time
1 month
Scope
Branding, architecture, service design
The Product
- A small-business LLC website
- Appointment scheduling
- Business details: address, phone, email
The Problem
- Too many fonts and colours
- Outdated pictures
- Inaccurate scheduling information
The Result
- Unified fonts, colours and overall look
- Updated and improved scheduling
- Clearer, current pictures and information
Before & After
Drag to compare.
Four pages, one set of rules. Unified typography and colour, current photography, and a scheduling flow that finally matched the services actually on offer.
Drag the handle — or focus it and use the ← → keys



Page by Page
Four pages, one set of rules.
Home
Completely rethought. New photography, and calls to action where a visitor could actually reach them rather than one buried at the foot of the page.
Navigation
Simplified wording, and light-coloured static, hover and active states across the board — so the bar stays readable in every state instead of only the one it was designed in.
Testimonials
The old page hid each testimonial inside an image hover state — hard to read, and no indication anything was there. Now they look the way a visitor expects a testimonial to look, and they're current.
Footer
Unified colours and a spread-out orientation. Cleaner, and readable at the size people actually read a footer.
For a one-person business, consistency is the credibility.
Reflection
What I learned
With one designer and one month, the system is the deliverable. There was no time to art-direct four pages individually — and no need to. Decide the type scale, the palette and the spacing once, apply them everywhere, and most of the design problems solve themselves on the way past.
The scheduling page taught me the bigger lesson. It was the only genuine service problem on the site: the information was wrong, and every person who booked on it started the relationship with a small disappointment. No amount of visual work would have fixed that. Getting the content right was worth more than everything else I did in the month.
And a small-business client rarely asks for research. They ask for a new look. The research is what makes the new look work — so you do it anyway, quietly, and you show them the result rather than the method.
Back to the beginning